www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_smoke_notes.htm
 
To
the article.


 

NOTES

1. Jonah Goldberg writes: "People who want to denounce the influence of Jews get to use the word 'neocon' when they really mean 'Jewish conservatives' without being held accountable." "RE: What the Heck is a 'Neocon'?"; "Blaming the Jews," Washington Post, March 12, 2003, p. A20.

[Back to the text.]


2. Among the neoconservative defenders citing the anti-Semitic conspiracy are David Harsanyi, "Beware of the Neocons," FrontPageMagazine, August 13, 2002.

[Back to the text.]


3. Paul Gottfried, "Goldberg Is Not the Worst," March 20, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


4. Max Boot, "What the Heck Is a 'Neocon'?", December 30, 2002.

[Back to the text.]


5. Paul Gottfried, The Conservative Movement (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1993); Peter Steinfels, The Neoconservatives: The Men Who Are Changing America's Politics (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979); Gary Dorrien, The Neoconservative Mind: Politics, Culture, and the War of Ideology (Philadelphia: Temple University, 1993); and John Ehrman, The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945-1994 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995).

[Back to the text.]


6. The "godfather" of neoconservatism, Irving Kristol, obviously used the term. See Irving Kristol, Reflections of a Neoconservative (New York: Basic Books, 1983). Kristol provided the catchy definition of a neoconservative as a "liberal who has been mugged by reality."

As political scientist Benjamin Ginsburg puts it:

One major factor that drew them inexorably to the right was their attachment to Israel and their growing frustration during the 1960s with a Democratic party that was becoming increasingly opposed to American military preparedness and increasingly enamored of Third World causes [e.g., Palestinian rights]. In the Reaganite right's hard-line anti-communism, commitment to American military strength, and willingness to intervene politically and militarily in the affairs of other nations to promote democratic values (and American interests), neocons found a political movement that would guarantee Israel's security. (Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), p. 231.

[Back to the text.]


7. Jonah Goldberg, Goldberg File, National Review Online, "Jews and the War: Listening to the Ugly Noses," March 13, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


8. For Perle's current efforts to rake in the swag see Eric Alterman, "Perle, Interrupted," The Nation, April 7, 2003; and Frida Berrigan, "Richard Perle: It Pays To Be the Prince of Darkness," "In These Times," March 21, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


9. Tony Blankley, "Sad end to civilized edifices," Washington Times, March 13, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


10. James D. Besser, "Jews Increasingly Blamed For War: Backlash evident before first shot fired in Iraq; fury over Rep. Moran's comments," Jewish Week, March 14, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


11. Debra Orin, "Underground Undermining Saddam," New York Post, March 18, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


12. Steve Sailer, "Analysis: Which American groups back war?," UPI, March 20, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


13. Youssef M. Ibrahim, "Democracy: Be Careful What You Wish For," Washington Post, March 23, 2003, p. B3.

[Back to the text.]


14. Sam Francis, "An Anti-War Column: Bush Likudniks seek to start 'World War IV'," March 20, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


15. David Frum, "Unpatriotic Conservatives," March 19, 2003.

[Back to the text.]


16. For the record, TLD editor-in-chief Nicholas Strakon reports that he does indeed take pleasure in any defeat of the Empire; but he also points out that he is neither a paleocon nor so much as a blip on Frum's radar screen.

[Back to the text.]


17. One prominent article that outlined this thesis was put forth by Oded Yinon, titled "A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s," which appeared in the World Zionist Organization's periodical Kivunim in February 1982. Summarizing this strategy in his The Zionist Plan for the Middle East (Belmont, Mass.: Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc., 1982), the late Israel Shahak observed that Yinon's essay "represents ... the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan) for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states."

Shahak continued: "To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel's satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation."

[Back to the text.]


18. Washington's Farewell Address.

[Back to the text.]


Stranded on this page from off site?
Here are TLD's home page and table of contents.