Trapped on our home page with no table of contents?
Here's your escape hatch.

Don't miss Ronn Neff's Thornwalker site!

Skip down to boilerplate.

Posted September 3, 2018: A new essay by senior editor Ronn Neff!


Posted September 12, 2018.

Ronn Neff: Acronymph. If I rearrange the letters alphabetically (because I like alphabetical order) and speak of people who are BGLT, am I being insensitive? Would I lose my job if I were a journalist? Is the actual order of the letters mandatory? Ω

Posted September 6, 2018.

Ronn Neff: More twisting. On September 4, the Washington Post ran "Gun control or gun rights? The answer may help determine whether Rep. Comstock wins reelection," by Jenna Portnoy.

It begins: "As the nation grapples with mass shootings, gun policy could be a deciding factor in the competitive race between Rep. Barbara Comstock (R) and Democratic challenger state Sen. Jennifer T. Wexton in Northern Virginia." Notice the collective mind-reading. Reader, are you grappling with mass shootings?

In paragraph 5 we read, "Voters in Virginia believe gun control is more important than protecting gun rights, according to a recent poll that captured a watershed moment in a once-conservative state."

You would expect that in a website posting of the story that the phrase "a recent poll" would be a hyperlink, directing the reader to the relevant poll. No such luck.

In paragraph 29 (!) we learn that the poll is a Roanoke College Poll, according to which (says the Post), "48 percent of likely voters think it's more important to control gun ownership than to protect the right of Americans to own guns; 44 percent believe gun rights are paramount."

It is in this paragraph that we get the hyperlink:

The Post accurately reports the results for question #18 ("Finally, what do you think is more important — to protect the right of Americans to own guns, OR to control gun ownership?"), although the numbers are not all that different from the results for the same question in January 2015.

But look back up to question #8. You will see that 25 percent either had no opinion or refused to answer the question: "What is the most important issue to you in this election?" Gun control (along with six other issues) came in ELEVENTH, with 1 percent answering that it was most important.

Did the Washington Post lie? Did it err? It did not. Did it deliberately try to mislead readers? Yes.

More than that, with its — well, let's call it "disinformation" — it is trying to affect the outcome of the election.

In June 2012 the Post ran a lengthy feature on Virgil Goode, the Constitution Party's candidate for president that year. They pretended to fret that Goode's candidacy "would shave votes from" Mitt Romney. Of course, given that they had never done such a feature on any other Constitution Party presidential candidate, one suspects that they were in fact expecting and even hoping that by giving Goode more publicity than he could ever afford to purchase, they might accomplish exactly that which they pretended to fear.

Did the Post lie? Did it err? It did not. Was it trying to affect the outcome of the election?

By the way, we keep hearing that Russian trolls tried to affect the 2016 election, favoring Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. Does anyone else find it interesting that we are not told what the trolls said?

More and more it is apparent that the job of the major media is not to tell us what is happening, but what they want us to believe is happening. And what they want to happen. Apparently they believe that to say X makes X true. That is, they believe in magic. Ω

Posted August 30, 2018.

Ronn Neff: The frenzy over John McCain's death has underscored the media and the Left's views of Republicans: The only good Republican is a dead Republican. Ω

What do you think?
"Stop and think" archive.

TLD is a forum of opinion, edited by hard-core market anarchists, that does not flinch from any of the most pressing issues of our time. We are especially interested in questions of culture and ethnicity, our Polite Totalitarian ruling class, and the homicidal humanitarianism of the U.S. Empire.

Our writers include anarcho-pessimists, Old Believers in the West, unreconstructed Confederates, neo-Objectivists, and other enemies of the permanent regime. We are conscientiously indifferent to considerations of thoughtcrime. Thus, from individualist and Euro-American perspectives, we confront the end of civilization — and do our level best to name its destroyers. (More about who we are.)

— Nicholas Strakon, editor-in-chief
Ronald N. Neff, senior editor

WTM Enterprises
P.O. Box 224
Roanoke, IN 46783

"If this government cared about ideas, it would crack down on The Last Ditch. It could be called The Joy of Thinking."

Joe Sobran

"Whoever said 'Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty' didn't realize it, but he was thinking of The Last Ditch."

— Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance

Permanently recommended readings

"What Is Austrian Economics?" (Mises Institute)
"I, Pencil," by Leonard E. Read (Liberty Fund;
scroll down for text)
"The Epistemological Basis of Anarchism,"
by Roy A. Childs, Jr. (TLD)
"Polite totalitarianism," by Ronald N. Neff (TLD)

Published in 2018 by WTM Enterprises, P.O. Box 224, Roanoke, IN 46783-0224.

Please note that Thornwalker is only the "landlord" for The Last Ditch. WTM Enterprises is solely responsible for all design and content on this site.

Nicholas Strakon